CIPS L4M1 Dumps Questions Answers

- Definition of ‘structured procurement process’ – when an organisation provides a sequence of actions / steps to take to get the outcome (the procurement of an item). This involves an organisation providing guidelines and instructions of how things should be done. Basically following a step-by-step process.

- Why this is important – Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done, maintains consistency, prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour, improves efficiency, better managerial control, compliance (with laws and standards), assists with continuous improvement, may result in time/ cost savings, reduces risks such as fraudulent spending.

Example essay:

The first part of the question is worth 10 points, so you could include a few of the following points. It would also be good to include examples:

- Structured procurement involves creating rules on how procurement should be done

- This is in contrast to reactive / maverick spending

- May come about due to company policy, external regulations or through trying to achieve Competitive Advantage

- Examples include an organisation having set procedures for ordering items of different spend- e.g. Procurement Assistants can purchase items up to £500. Items between £500-£1000 require a manager’s approval and anything over £1000 requires a written Business Case in order to procure

- Structures Procurement Processes will usually also include the use of a designated e-procurement tool. E.g. an organisation may insist that all tenders use a certain online system and that invoices are sent via X system within 30 days.

The second part of the question is worth slightly more points, so spend more time on this. You could put each of the reasons why it is important in a separate paragraph. Also use examples where you can;

- Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done- having structured processes means having a step-by-step guide to how to procure. This means activities are well co-ordinated and there are no gaps, no duplications of effort and no conflicting efforts. It may involve assigning different people in the team different roles e.g. someone makes the requisition and someone else approves it. It also means that nothing is forgotten.

- Maintains consistency- having standardised processes means each procurement exercise follows the same process. This may include using a standard template for a requisition or ITT. Where there is consistency, this results in time being saved and less mistakes being made as everyone (including supply partners) is familiar with the processes.

- Prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour- in organisations that use structured procurement processes everyone does the same. This means there is no conflict (e.g. one person doing things one way and another person does it differently and arguing which way is best). It also means no one can do procurement ‘wrong’ – there are written guides and procedures to follow. This is particularly helpful for new starters.

- Efficiency – time and money can be saved where there are standard procedures as people don’t have to plan each procurement activity individually. Structured Procurement Processes may also involve completing bulk orders and co-ordinating activity within the organisation which means less orders are placed over the year and efficiency savings can be made. For example, a factory may create an order of cleaning products once a quarter, compared to ordering products just as and when they are required. This will save time of the procurement department overall throughout the year and allows them to focus on other more value-adding tasks.

- Better managerial control – Managers have more oversight when using structured procurement. There are clear rules as to when managers need to be involved and provide sign-off. This visibility makes it easier for managers to make decisions and allows for early intervention where someone needs assistance. It will reduce maverick spending and fraudulent spending. For example, it is much harder to provide kick-backs to suppliers when there are clear processes and audit trails and managers have visibility over all processes.

- Compliance (with laws and standards) – particularly in the Public Sector there are rules and regulations regarding procurement practices. Using standardised processes allows organisations to demonstrate compliance with appropriate legislation. It also protects them from ‘challenge’. This is when a bidder who is unsuccessful challenges the decision to award a contract to someone else. Using a structured procurement process allows the organisation to demonstrate that they procured the item correctly and the challenge is unfounded.

Tutor Notes

- This topic isn’t as well explained in the new study guide as it used to be. It’s all pretty obvious stuff but the language is slightly different. The guide now talks about ‘compliance with processes’ and the benefits this brings. Which is exactly the same as why do you follow a structured process. This is on p. 114.

- If you’re feeling clever, you could mention the difference between Public and Private Sector- e.g. a private organisation may use standardised processes for efficiency and cost savings, whereas a public sector organisation may use it more for compliance purposes.

How to approach the question

- This question is worth 25 marks so you can imagine what the mark scheme will look like. There are 5 Rights so there will be 5 points for each Right. Naming the Right will be one point, then you have 4 points for a description and example. You should therefore aim to have 4-5 sentences per Right.

- I would recommend using headings for this type of essay- clearly putting your essay into 5 sections for each right. This makes it easy for the examiner to mark.

Proposed Essay structure

- Introduction – what is meant by the 5 Rights

- Price

- Quality

- Quantity

- Time

- Place

- Conclusion – why it’s important, all rights are equally as important

Example Essay

Procurement revolves around achieving the delicate balance of acquiring goods and/ or services at the right price, quality, quantity, time, and place. This essay explains why these "Five Rights of Procurement" are important and explains how using this metric can help procurement to make smart choices when they purchase goods or services.

Price:

Firstly, it is important that procurement do not simply seek to find the cheapest option. The First Right is about finding the product/ service at an affordable price that doesn't compromise on quality. Let's say a company is buying office furniture. They might go for a supplier that offers a good balance between cost and quality, ensuring they get good value for their money. Considerations here may include Total Cost of Ownership, the Price Iceberg, and Whole Life Costing. The company therefore may seek to get the best price, but in relation to how long the furniture will last. A cheap chair that will break after one year may not be the best price compared to another chair which will last 10 years.

Quality:

The second right, quality, looks at legal compliance and fitness for purpose. Quality adherence aligns with specifications as well as legislation such as the UK Sale of Goods Act 1979. This helps ensure that items meet their commonly intended purpose and maintains satisfactory condition. Buyers deploy both reactive measures like Quality Control and proactive approaches like Quality Assurance to uphold the stipulated quality. This commitment not only ensures legal compliance but also underpins customer satisfaction, brand reputation, and ethical sourcing policies. An example of quality is an organisation buying a washing machine that conforms to ISO standard 97.060 and has a 2-year warrantee.

Quantity:

The third right, quantity, is a strategic consideration about how much of an item to order. It is connected to efficient inventory management. One tool that procurement can use to ensure they order the right quantity of a product is Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) – this serves as a tool for finding the equilibrium between stock-holding costs and avoiding stockouts. Market conditions, supply chain dynamics (e.g. JIT / Lean manufacturing), and organizational policies collectively play a pivotal role in determining the right quantity. For example a confectionary manufacturer will need to order the right number of eggs to make cakes- they will need to consider how many eggs they will need in order to make the cakes, but also take into consideration that they may not need them all at onceand that eggs can expire. The use of an MRP system is helpful when determining quantities of products to order.

Time:

Time is about getting things when we need them. In the above example, an egg delivery timing for a confectionary manufacturer will be pivotal to making the cakes on time. Other considerations about time include changing market forces and customer demand. The use of forecasting is therefore extremely useful; particularly if there are peaks in demand for a product, such as toys at Christmas. Moreover, organizations need to avoid bottlenecks and production stoppages, so time (including lead time and delivery time) is an important consideration when making orders.

Place:

Lastly, place is about getting things to the right location. Minimizing environmental impact, reducing risks during transit, and optimizing warehousing practices contribute to achieving the right place. This is particularly important for perishable items such as food, and for items which require specific storage conditions such as chemicals. This involves good planning in terms of logistics, minimizing any impact on the environment during transport and a consideration for safety.

In conclusion, the Five Rights of Procurement provide a structured framework for organizations to optimize their sourcing practices. All rights are equally as important and it is the relationship between the Rights which is key. While price, quality, quantity, time, and place form the foundation, evolving models acknowledge additional elements like the Right Relationship with the Supplier. Embracing these principles not only ensures operational efficiency but also promotes sustainability and ethical conduct throughout the procurement process, contributing to long-term success in a globalized and dynamic marketplace.

Tutor Notes

- The 5 Rights is a big topic in CIPS so do learn them off by heart. It’s p. 20 in the study guide.

- The conclusion mentions that additional ‘rights’ are starting to be introduced into the matrix, this is true and isn’t mentioned in this study guide. I believe this starts to come up in Level 5. Just something to be aware of- some people are now talking about other Rights such as finding the right supplier and the right relationship. It’s good to know, but not essential for this essay. Neither is knowing the ISO standard for washing machines – that’s certainly not in the book. You can sprinkle in your own knowledge to essays like this, as it demonstrates you’re able to apply the theory to real life. Why I remember the ISO for washing machines is a different story….

- You could also have mentioned the following topics;

o price – using the right currency and incoterm, aggregation of spend, negotiating prices

o quality – conformance and performance specs

o quantity – fulfilling retail orders, large order quantities leading to discount

o time – additional costs of a stockout, impact on relationships and reputation

o place – additional costs if delivery fails

- This is the type of question you can easily over-write. It’s a huge topic and you could easily spend too long on it and not have enough time to answer other questions. So be careful with your timings. You don’t need to mention everything above.

- Another way this type of question can come up is as a scenario. E.g. XYZ is a manufacturer of cakes and needs to order eggs. Discuss how XYZ can ensure the 5 Rights of Procurement when ordering Eggs.

How to approach this question.

- There’s many aspects to this question – make sure you’re answering them all:

- Explain what added value is and explain what ‘ensuring processes are compliant’ means (this could be your introduction) Added Value = achieving more for the same money. May be in producing an item cheaper, or by procuring additional features at no additional cost. Requires innovation and creativity. The focus is on the outcome. Compliant Processes – this is focusing on the process, rather than the outcome. Ensuring that purchases are made in line with internal and external rules/ procedures. This may be following Standard Operating Procedures, purchasing to strict budgets and the exclusive use of e-procurement tools.

- Explain the consequences of focusing on added value over compliance; can result in maverick spending, less visibility for management, may have additional risks if procuring items without following procedures – this may have legal and financial repercussions, Time-consuming, May lead to added expenses

- Consequences of focusing on compliance over added value; May foster a silo-mentality, Misses out on flexibility and agility, misses out on collaborative whole life costs reductions, Procurement function becomes rigid, inflexible and inwardly focused

- How both can be achieved; 1) Seek to add value only for certain purchases such as capital-expenditure items and not for others such as stationary.2) Ensure time is well-spent i.e. focus on added value for purchases where this can be most achieved, and focus on compliance where there is high risks. 3) Review processes regularly to ensure both goals are being achieved 4) Complete ‘lessons learned’ activities after big procurement activities to advise on future procurement activities- were both Added Value and Compliance achieved? How could this be improved next time?

- these three should form the main body of your essay. Above are many ideas you could explore, you won’t have time to talk about all of them so pick a couple that resonate with you

Conclusion – the balance is important

Example Essay

Added value refers to the extra worth or enhancement a company provides to a product, service, or process that goes beyond the intrinsic value inherent in the initial input. It represents the additional benefits or features that make a product or service more desirable to customers, often justifying a higher price or distinguishing it from competitors. Procurement often look to achieve added value in procurement activities but achieving this whilst remaining compliant (adhering to established laws, regulations, standards, and internal policies) can be tricky. Achieving a delicate equilibrium between pursuing added value and ensuring stringent compliance in procurement activities is pivotal. This essay explores the consequences of emphasizing one area over the other and outlines strategies for organizations to successfully navigate the dual goals of attaining added value and maintaining compliance.

Consequences of Focusing Solely on Added Value:

Prioritizing added value without due consideration for compliance can expose an organization to a myriad of risks. One notable consequence is the potential compromise of regulatory requirements and legal standards. For instance, if a procurement team is solely driven by obtaining cost-effective solutions or innovative products, they may inadvertently overlook compliance with industry-specific regulations, leading to legal ramifications and reputational damage.

Moreover, an exclusive focus on added value may neglect crucial ethical considerations. An organization, in pursuit of cost savings or improved efficiency, might engage with suppliers that violate ethical standards or engage in unethical business practices such as modern day slavery. Such associations can tarnish the organization's reputation, eroding the trust of stakeholders and customers alike.

Consequences of Overemphasizing Compliance:

Conversely, a hyper-focus on compliance without adequate consideration for added value can result in missed opportunities and suboptimal outcomes. Strict adherence to procedural norms and regulations might lead to an overly bureaucratic procurement process, hindering innovation and stifling the organization's ability to adapt swiftly to market changes.

Furthermore, an excessive emphasis on compliance might limit engagement with suppliers, stifling creativity and potential breakthroughs. For instance, a procurement team rigidly adhering to compliance protocols might miss out on collaborating with smaller, innovative suppliers that could offer unique and value-added solutions.

Strategies for Achieving Both Added Value and Compliance:

To navigate the delicate balance between added value and compliance, organizations can adopt several strategic approaches. First and foremost, an organization should establish clear procurement policies and procedures that incorporate both compliance requirements and avenues for seeking added value. This ensures that all procurement activities align with regulatory standards while leaving room for innovation.

Effective supplier management plays a pivotal role in achieving this balance. By thoroughly vetting and categorizing suppliers based on their ability to deliver value and comply with regulations, organizations can strategically align their procurement activities. For example,suppliers that have a proven track record of compliance can be trusted with critical components, while those offering innovative solutions may be engaged for projects that prioritize added value.

Leveraging technology is another essential strategy. Implementing advanced procurement software that integrates compliance checks and offers analytics for value assessment can significantly enhance the efficiency of procurement processes. Automated systems can streamline due diligence, ensuring that suppliers meet compliance standards while providing insights into their potential to deliver added value.

Additionally, fostering a culture of collaboration within the procurement team and across organizational departments is crucial. Encouraging open communication enables different stakeholders to contribute insights on compliance and added value. Cross-functional collaboration ensures that procurement decisions align with broader organizational goals and values.

In conclusion, the strategic balancing act between achieving added value and ensuring compliance in procurement is indispensable for organizational success. By recognizing the consequences of favouring one area over the other and adopting a holistic approach, this safeguards against risks but also positions the organization for sustained growth and competitiveness in the ever-evolving business landscape.

Tutor Notes:

- Examples highlight that you understand the material you have studied and can apply it to real life scenarios. You could take a certain industry or organisation and explain the consequences for them of focusing on one over the other. E.g. In the construction industry it is very important that organisations achieve compliance in their procurement activities. This includes ensuring there are robust contracts in place and that legislation such as CDM and Health and Safety is followed. When procuring a construction contract the danger of focusing on Added Value over compliance is that this may result in key legislation being forgotten which leads to legal proceedings against the buyer. For example, if the buyer procures a construction contract without fulfilling the responsibilities outlined in the CDM and H&S regulations, this can result in huge fines for the company and potential jail time for senior management.

- The risk of focusing on compliance over added value may be in missing out on alternative proposals. For example, if a buyer is procuring a construction project of a new hospital and they focus too much on compliance, they may not engage in Early Supplier Involvement or cross-functional working which may bring up alternative ideas such as different ways the hospital could be built. The alternative ideas may result in higher quality or cost savings which are missed by the buyer. This results in a more costly, or lower-quality hospital being built.

- Overall, what CIPS are testing you on here is that you understand that the procurement department should aim to achieve both – it’s a balancing act between compliance and added value and this could be viewed as a pendulum- it’s important not to swing too heavily in one direction. That’s actually a really good metaphor – feel free to use that in your conclusion!

- study guide p. 114