L4M1 Scope and Influence of Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

- there are a lot of components to this question so I would take a good 5 minutes to write out some bullet points on the characteristics of each one, and on some differences. Then from your notes make this into an essay. The mark scheme isn’t 100% clear on how many characteristics and differences you need to name, so try and keep an equal split between the two areas. You would probably need 2-3 characteristics of each, and 3 differences for a good score.

- Characteristics of goods: tangible, homogeneous, items tend not to perish quickly, can be stored

- Characteristics of services: intangible, heterogenous, inseparable (produced and consumed at the same time), no transfer of ownership, perish upon use (i.e. cannot be stored)

- Characteristics of construction work: project-based procurement, includes procuring both goods and services, complex procurement which has its own set of regulations (CDM2015).

- Differences between these

1) goods are not usually outsourced and services can be.

2) Complexity of the supply chain (goods and construction may have a complex supply chains, but service contracts usually only involve 2 parties).

3) Timescales – construction work has a designated timescale but procurement of goods could be a one off or long-term contract, services is usually a long-term contract.

Example Essay

Introduction:

Procurement is a multifaceted field, and understanding the nuances between procuring goods, services, and construction works is pivotal for effective management. This essay explores the main characteristics that differentiate these categories.

Tangible / Intangible:

Goods are tangible items that can be physically seen and touched. For instance, raw materials like wheat and sugar in a manufacturing organization are tangible goods. On the other hand, services are intangible—though the results can be observed, the service itself cannot be touched. An example is a cleaning contract for a factory; while the effects of the cleaning are visible, the service itself remains intangible. Construction is usually a mixture of tangible and intangible procurement; the tangible is the construction materials such as bricks and windows, and the intangible aspect is the labour to complete the project.

Heterogeneous / Homogeneous:

Goods are generally homogeneous, meaning they are always the same. For example, steel purchased for manufacturing purposes will always be the same. In contrast, services are heterogeneous, varying each time they are rendered. Customer service, for instance, is inherently different each time due to the dynamic nature of customer interactions. Construction could be either heterogeneous or homogeneous depending on the project – is it a one off unique building, or is it a large housing estate of same-build properties?

Transfer of Ownership:

When goods are procured, there is a transfer of ownership. The product becomes the property of the buyer upon delivery and payment. In contrast, services do not involve a transfer of ownership as there is no physical entity to transfer. In construction the transfer of ownership is extremely complex and varies depending on the project. Usually the buyer will retain ownership of the land throughout the project, but on some occasions the construction company may take ownership for insurance purposes.

Storable (Separable/ Inseparable):

Goods are storable, allowing for purchase on one day and use on another. For example a factory can buy in plastic to be used to manufacture toys and this is stored in inventory until the time comes to make the toys. However, services are consumed at the point of purchase, making them inseparable. The service is bought and utilized simultaneously. Services cannot be stored. This is the same for construction.

Ability to Outsource:

Goods are rarely outsourced, as they are typically purchased directly from suppliers. Services, on the other hand, can be easily outsourced—examples include outsourcing finance, cleaning, or security services. Construction works are commonly outsourced, with external companies hired to execute projects.

Complexity of the Supply Chain:

Service contracts often involve a simple two-party relationship between the buyer and the supplier. Goods and construction, however, may have complex supply chains. For example, procuring a pen involves a supply chain with various steps, including the raw material supplier, manufacturer, and possibly a wholesaler. Construction works often feature a tiered supply chain with subcontractors playing crucial roles.

Construction as a Hybrid:

Construction procurement represents a hybrid, incorporating elements of both goods and services. It involves hiring a service, such as a bricklayer for laying bricks, while also procuring the tangible goods—bricks. Separating goods from services in construction is challenging, as they are often intertwined, and both aspects are paid for simultaneously.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, distinguishing between the procurement of goods, services, and construction works is essential for effective supply chain management. The tangible or intangible nature, heterogeneity, transfer of ownership, storability, outsourcing potential, and supply chain complexities offer a comprehensive framework for understanding the unique characteristics of each category. Recognizing these distinctions empowers organizations to tailor their procurement strategies to the specific challenges and dynamics associated with goods, services, and construction works.

Tutor Notes

- What a characteristic is can also be a difference. So for example you can say tangible is a characteristic of goods but tangibility is also the main difference between goods and services. So don’t worry too much about which order to write stuff in, or doing clear sections for this type of essay. It all comes out in the wash.

- Other differences in procuring these include:

- Costs: procuring goods such as stationary for an office will be low-cost so may not require approval, but a service contract may require management sign off. Procuring construction projects tend to be huge sums of money

- Where the budget comes from: goods and services may be operational expenditure and construction works capital expenditure.

- The level of risk involved in the procurement: goods tends to be quite low risk and construction high risk.

- Types of contract involved: procuring goods may be very simple and just require a PO, services is more complex so may require a formal contract or Deed of Appointment. Construction projects will require a contract due to the high value and high risk of the purchase

- Legislation – Goods = Sale of Goods Act, Construction - CDM Regulations 2015. Construction is much more heavily regulated than services or goods. Note CDM regulations isn’t part of CIPS. It’s occasionally referenced in various modules but you don’t have to really know what it is. Just know it’s the main legislation governing the construction industry. Construction - Construction Design and Management Regulations 2015 (hse.gov.uk)

- Study guide LO 1.3.1 p. 40, but mainly p. 52 for services. NOTE the title of this learning outcome includes construction and it is hardly mentioned in the study guide. Most of the above information on construction comes from my own knowledge rather than the book.

How to approach the question

Your answer should provide details on 3 of the following:

- Contract Award and Implementation

- Warehouse Logistics

- Contract performance and Improvement

- Supplier Relationship Management

- Asset Management

Because the question is only asking for 3 stages, you’re going to have to go much more into detail for each stage, giving lots of information about why each stage is important and examples. You could consider thinking of an example procurement you have done recently and explaining the stages for that. Or you could take a hypothetical procurement too. Either will get you the same marks. Pick the three that you can write the most about.

Essay Plan

Introduction – explain that sourcing of goods and the role of Procurement doesn’t end once a contract is signed. There is ongoing management and processes which must be carried out to ensure success.

Paragraph 1 – Contract Performance and Improvement

· This is about ensuring contract obligations are fulfilled. Contract administration includes P2P procedures, database management, budgeting / costs monitoring, reporting and dispute resolution

· Procurement’s role may be in managing contract performance through the use of SLAs and / or KPIs. This can be done via reporting, using a Supplier Scorecard and meeting regularly to discuss.

· It’s important KPIs are measured and that there are consequences for failing to meet them. An example of consequences could be using a Performance Improvement Plan.

· Contract Management also includes updating the contract where required – e.g. issuing variations to contract and updating the change control log

· Another important aspect of this is ensuring the costs remain within scope of the budget

· Contract performance can be compared if you have several suppliers delivering the same goods- could use a Factor Rating Method.

· Performance could be measured against several criteria such as on time deliveries, response time of supplier, number of complaints.

Paragraph 2 – Supplier Relationship Management

· There is a difference between managing the contract and managing the supplier relationship. It’s possible to have excellent contract performance and a terrible relationship. However, the two are generally linked- where there is a good relationship, the contract often performs well.

· The supplier management approach depends on where the relationship falls on the relationship spectrum (e.g. transactional or collaborative)

· This involves; maintaining regular contact with the supplier, motivating the supplier, working collaboratively with them (e.g. on performance issues or resolving any disputes)

· Incentivising the supplier leads to collaboration and mutual support

· To assess or rank suppliers you could use a vendor rating method or supplier evaluation forms

· Supplier relationship management may involve investing in the supplier- e.g. through training or technology sharing

Paragraph 3 – Asset Management

· Includes creating a post contract ‘lessons-learned’

· Assessments should be carried out to determine if business requirements have changed, whether the agreement is still required and fit for purpose, what can be learnt from the process and how improvements can be incorporated next time.

· This is the final stage of the Procurement Cycle and takes us back to the start of cycle, which begins again when the item needs to be reprocured

· Whole life costing should be considered at this stage: this is the total cost of ownership over the life of an asset. The concept is also known as life-cycle cost (LCC) or lifetime cost, and is commonly referred to as "cradle to grave" or "womb to tomb" costs.

· Generally used on large purchases such as machinery and vehicles. Full Asset Management may not necessary for direct cost items such as raw materials incorporated into final goods.

· Considerations may include; costs of running the asset, how long it will perform, insurance, maintenance, opportunity costs, disposing of the asset.

· Also consider environmental and social impacts of the procurement.

Conclusion – it is important that procurement are involved at every stage of the cycle, not just in the pre-award stages. Procurement can add value at every stage.

Tutor Notes

- Depending on the examples you choose to use, you could talk about how the type of item procured could impact on the different stages. For example, high risk purchases may require more contract management than low risk purchases, and capital expenditure items such as new machinery may require more attention to the Asset Management stage.

- You could also think about how procurement adds value at each of the stages.

- Study guide p. 79

How to approach this question

- There are three questions within this question. The purpose could be your introduction, and then take two big sections in the main body of your essay for the elements and how to evaluate it.

Example Essay

A Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy serves as a formal commitment by a company to conduct its business in a socially responsible and sustainable manner. The purpose of a CSR policy is to outline the organization's dedication to ethical practices, environmental stewardship, and social contributions. It reflects a company's commitment to going beyond mere profit generation and actively engaging in initiatives that benefit society and the environment.

Elements of a CSR Policy:

1. Ethical Business Practices:

· Clearly articulated principles on fair business dealings, anti-corruption measures, and adherence to ethical standards in all operations.

2. Environmental Sustainability:

· Commitments to minimize environmental impact through sustainable practices, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and responsible sourcing of materials.

3. Social Responsibility:

· Efforts to contribute positively to the community, which may include support for education, healthcare, poverty alleviation, or other social initiatives.

4. Labor Practices:

· Fair and ethical treatment of employees, including non-discrimination, fair wages, safe working conditions, and respect for workers' rights.

5. Supply Chain Responsibility:

· A commitment to ensuring that suppliers and partners adhere to similar ethical and CSR standards, promoting responsible practices throughout the entire supply chain.

6. Transparency and Accountability:

· Open disclosure of CSR initiatives, performance, and impacts, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and being accountable for CSR goals.

7. Stakeholder Engagement:

· A pledge to engage with and consider the interests of various stakeholders, including employees, customers, communities, and shareholders, in decision-making processes.

Evaluating a Supplier's CSR Policy:

Assessing a potential supplier's CSR policy involves a comprehensive examination of key factors to ensure alignment with ethical and responsible business practices:

1. Policy Content:

· Review the content of the CSR policy to ensure it covers a broad spectrum of social, environmental, and ethical aspects. A comprehensive policy reflects a commitment to holistic CSR practices.

2. Alignment with Industry Standards:

· Check if the CSR policy aligns with industry-specific standards and best practices. Adherence to recognized standards, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or ISO 26000, indicates a commitment to global CSR norms.

3. Performance Metrics:

· Evaluate whether the supplier includes measurable performance metrics in their CSR policy. Clear objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs) demonstrate a commitment to continual improvement and accountability.

4. Stakeholder Engagement:

· Assess how the supplier engages with stakeholders. A robust CSR policy should involve stakeholders in decision-making processes and demonstrate an understanding of their concerns.

5. Supply Chain Responsibility:

· Check if the supplier extends CSR principles to its supply chain. This involves ensuring that suppliers and partners adhere to ethical, environmental, and social standards, contributing to a responsible and sustainable supply chain.

6. Transparency and Reporting:

· Look for transparency in reporting. A supplier that openly communicates about its CSR initiatives, achievements, and challenges indicates a commitment to accountability and transparency.

7. Continuous Improvement:

· Evaluate if the supplier emphasizes a commitment to continuous improvement in its CSR policy. This indicates a dynamic approach to addressing emerging challenges and staying ahead of evolving CSR expectations.

By thoroughly examining these aspects, a buyer can gain insights into a potential supplier's commitment to corporate social responsibility and make informed decisions that align with their own CSR objectives and values.

Tutor Notes

- Students often ask if they can use bullet points in their essays. Many tutors say no, but the answer is actually more nuanced than that. I’ve purposefully written the above in bullet points to show you how it can be done effectively. Bullet points are fine, providing you’re using full sentences and it makes sense as a stylistic choice. It’s not a good option if you’re just going to list things without context. Then it can be hard to follow. I’ve personally used bullet points in essays and done really well. There’s no rule against it. You’ve just got to make sure you’re doing it ‘right’.

- CSR policies are only briefly mentioned in LO 2.4 but it does come up as quite a big topic in other parts of the syllabus so is worth knowing. You could mention some examples of big companies and what their stance on CSR is. A good one to look at is The Body Shop.

- The study guide references Carroll’s Pyramid – this would be great to include in your essay Carroll's CSR Pyramid explained: Theory, Examples and Criticism (toolshero.com) p.112

- Mention of some of the following benefits with at least one example provided against each; cost savings, time savings, more efficient, higher levels of transparency, easier to access historical records to inform upon decision making, mitigates risks such as fraudulent spending, easier to track spend against budgets, ensures compliance with regulations, provides ‘real-time’ information, paperless communications (so more environmentally friendly), assists in Supply Chain Management and integration with supply partners.

- I’d suggest 5 is a good amount to aim for

Example Essay

Procurement stands to gain numerous benefits from the adoption of electronic systems. These electronic tools and systems bring efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and cost-effectiveness to the procurement process. Here are several compelling reasons why procurement should leverage electronic systems:

Cost savings – the use of electronic tools saves organisations money. Although there is an initial cost outlay, over time the systems will save the organisation money. For example the use of e-procurement tools can save money by accessing a wider pool of suppliers. For example, when using an e-sourcing portal, a tender may reach a larger number of suppliers- this makes the tender more competitive thus driving down prices. Compared to traditional methods such as phoning suppliers for prices, the use of electronic portals encourages suppliers to ‘sharpen their pencils’ and provide the best prices in order to win work. Money is also saved as communication is digital (so there is no costs for paper and postage).

Time savings – electronic tools automate a lot of processes which saves time. An example of this is e-requisitioning tools where orders can be placed automatically by a piece of technology when quantities of a material reach a certain level. For example, in a cake manufacturing organisation they may use an MRP system which calculates how many eggs are required per day. The machine knows that when the company only have 50 eggs left, a new order needs to be issued to the supplier. The MRP system (e-requisitioning system) therefore saves time as the Procurement department doesn’t have to manually pick up the phone to place the order with the supplier- it is done automatically.

Access to higher levels of information - e-Procurement gives you centralised access to all your data. You can access the system to look at historical purchases with ease compared to having to dig through folders and filing cabinets. For example, an electronic PO system will hold details of all historical POs, this means if someone has a question about a PO that was raised 4 months ago, finding the information is much easier and quicker. Some systems may also be able to provide analytical data such as changes to spend over time, or which suppliers a buyer spends the most money with. This higher level of information can help inform upon future decision making. For example, if the organisation wishes to consolidate its supplier base it would look through historical data provided by the electronic system to find out which suppliers are used the least and remove these from the ‘pre-approved supplier list’. This level of data might not be available in manual systems.

Better budget tracking – using electronic systems allows for real-time information to be collected which allows Procurement Managers to see where spend is compared to forecasts and budgets. An example of this is in the use of Pre-Payment Cards – rather than giving staff members petty cash to make transactions and having to chase this up and collect receipts and change, a pre-payment card usually comes with an online portal where a manager can see what has been purchased and the remaining budget on that card for the month. A manager may be able to see for example that a member of staff has spend £300 of their allotted £500 monthly allowance.

Higher levels of transparency and control – using E-procurement tools allows an organisation to track who is ordering what. For example, an e-requisitioning tool may allow Procurement Assistants to make purchases up to £500 but set an automatic escalation if they try to buy something of higher value. This allows for Management to have greater levels of visibility and more control over spending. Another example of transparency and control is in the use of e-sourcing tools to run a competitive tender exercise. All communication between the buyer and suppliers is tracked on the system and award letters can be sent via the system too. This reduces the risk of information being lost.

Environmental benefits- the use of e-procurement tools means that there is less paperwork involved. For example, rather than creating a physical PO which needs to be signed by a manager, an electronic system can allow a manager to sign-off the purchase by clicking a button. This means there is no requirement for the document to be printed. This saves paper and thus has a positive on the environment. Using electronic systems may help an organisation achieve their environmental targets.

In conclusion there are numerous benefits for procurement to adopt e-procurement tools. Depending on the sector and requirements of each individualised company, some advantages may be more pertinent than others, but it is undeniable that technology is helping to shape the industry into a value adding function of organisations.

Tutor Notes

- With an essay like this you could use subheadings and number the advantages if you like. It’s a good idea to do one advantage per paragraph and using formatting really helps the examiner to read your essay.

- study guide p.108

- The question is asking you to explain the following:

- With this type of question you would be expected to discuss 3- 5 differences, giving examples.

Example Essay Structure

Introduction – explain what is meant by ‘procurement’ and ‘SCM’ – procurement is the traditional way and is to do with purchasing goods, SCM is the new way which is a more multifaceted way of securing goods and is the result of longer, more complex and more globalised supply chains.

Paragraph 1 – the objectives of each approach (5 Rights vs added value)

Paragraph 2 – the approach (reactive buying vs proactive ordering)

Paragraph 3 - the way of working (silo working vs cross-functional working)

Paragraph 4 – the relationships with suppliers (transactional vs collaborative)

Conclusion – There are many differences between the two approaches, and different companies may favour one over the other depending on their specific circumstances. E.g. small organisations that make low value and low risk purchases may take a traditional procurement approach and large multi-national organisations may require a SRM approach due to the volume of suppliers and com-plexities of the supply chains.

Example essay:

Procurement and Supply Chain Management (SCM) represent two distinct approaches to acquiring goods, reflecting the evolution of purchasing practices. Procurement, the traditional method, in-volves the straightforward purchase of goods. In contrast, SCM is a more intricate approach, born out of longer, more complex, and globalized supply chains. This essay explores the main differences between these two approaches, highlighting their objectives, methods, ways of working, and suppli-er relationships.

In the traditional procurement approach, the focus is on achieving the "5 Rights" – getting the right goods, in the right quantity, at the right quality, for the right price, and at the right time. This en-sures efficiency in the purchasing process. On the other hand, SCM goes beyond these basic objec-tives, aiming to add value to the entire supply chain. This might involve developing strategic rela-tionships with suppliers, ensuring sustainability, and aligning with broader organizational goals. For example, a company employing a traditional procurement approach might emphasize getting the lowest price, while an SCM approach could involve working with suppliers to enhance product in-novation or reduce environmental impact.

Secondly, the traditional procurement approach is often reactive, responding to immediate needs or demands. Companies using this method typically make purchases as required, without a long-term strategy. In contrast, SCM involves proactive ordering, anticipating future needs and trends. For instance, a company employing SCM might engage in demand forecasting, allowing for better plan-ning and inventory management. This proactive approach helps prevent stockouts, reduce costs, and enhance overall supply chain efficiency.

Moreover, traditional procurement often involves silo working, where different departments operate independently. The procurement team may not collaborate closely with other departments like pro-duction or marketing. In SCM, there's an emphasis on cross-functional working, breaking down de-partmental barriers for a more integrated approach. For example, an SCM team might work closely with production to ensure materials are aligned with manufacturing schedules, fostering efficiency and minimizing disruptions.

Lastly, in traditional procurement, the relationship with suppliers is transactional – focused solely on the exchange of goods for money. Conversely, SCM promotes collaborative relationships, emphasiz-ing long-term partnerships. A company using SCM might work closely with suppliers to improve processes, share information, and jointly address challenges. For instance, an SCM approach might involve collaborating with suppliers to implement just-in-time inventory systems, leading to cost savings and improved responsiveness.

In conclusion, the differences between traditional procurement and SCM are substantial and nu-anced. While a traditional procurement approach may suit smaller organizations with low-value and low-risk purchases, larger multinational companies with complex supply chains often find SCM more suitable. Understanding these differences allows companies to tailor their approach based on their unique circumstances, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and strategic alignment with organizational goals in the ever-evolving landscape of buying and supply chain management.

Tutor Notes

- This question is taken from learning outcome 1.1.1 (p2 onwards). The new study guide has drasti-cally simplified the information on this topic compared to the old syllabus (the table above comes from the old syllabus). This may be good news for students in that you don’t need to know as much, but I do wonder if the study guide gives students enough ‘content’ to write an essay on the subject.

- If a question is to come up from LO 1.1 it would be likely be something like: definitions and dif-ferences between procurement and SCM, difference between a supply chain and a supply network, elements of SCM, or how to add value in the supply chain.

How to approach this question.

- There’s many aspects to this question – make sure you’re answering them all:

- Explain what added value is and explain what ‘ensuring processes are compliant’ means (this could be your introduction) Added Value = achieving more for the same money. May be in producing an item cheaper, or by procuring additional features at no additional cost. Requires innovation and creativity. The focus is on the outcome. Compliant Processes – this is focusing on the process, rather than the outcome. Ensuring that purchases are made in line with internal and external rules/ procedures. This may be following Standard Operating Procedures, purchasing to strict budgets and the exclusive use of e-procurement tools.

- Explain the consequences of focusing on added value over compliance; can result in maverick spending, less visibility for management, may have additional risks if procuring items without following procedures – this may have legal and financial repercussions, Time-consuming, May lead to added expenses

- Consequences of focusing on compliance over added value; May foster a silo-mentality, Misses out on flexibility and agility, misses out on collaborative whole life costs reductions, Procurement function becomes rigid, inflexible and inwardly focused

- How both can be achieved; 1) Seek to add value only for certain purchases such as capital-expenditure items and not for others such as stationary.2) Ensure time is well-spent i.e. focus on added value for purchases where this can be most achieved, and focus on compliance where there is high risks. 3) Review processes regularly to ensure both goals are being achieved 4) Complete ‘lessons learned’ activities after big procurement activities to advise on future procurement activities- were both Added Value and Compliance achieved? How could this be improved next time?

- these three should form the main body of your essay. Above are many ideas you could explore, you won’t have time to talk about all of them so pick a couple that resonate with you

Conclusion – the balance is important

Example Essay

Added value refers to the extra worth or enhancement a company provides to a product, service, or process that goes beyond the intrinsic value inherent in the initial input. It represents the additional benefits or features that make a product or service more desirable to customers, often justifying a higher price or distinguishing it from competitors. Procurement often look to achieve added value in procurement activities but achieving this whilst remaining compliant (adhering to established laws, regulations, standards, and internal policies) can be tricky. Achieving a delicate equilibrium between pursuing added value and ensuring stringent compliance in procurement activities is pivotal. This essay explores the consequences of emphasizing one area over the other and outlines strategies for organizations to successfully navigate the dual goals of attaining added value and maintaining compliance.

Consequences of Focusing Solely on Added Value:

Prioritizing added value without due consideration for compliance can expose an organization to a myriad of risks. One notable consequence is the potential compromise of regulatory requirements and legal standards. For instance, if a procurement team is solely driven by obtaining cost-effective solutions or innovative products, they may inadvertently overlook compliance with industry-specific regulations, leading to legal ramifications and reputational damage.

Moreover, an exclusive focus on added value may neglect crucial ethical considerations. An organization, in pursuit of cost savings or improved efficiency, might engage with suppliers that violate ethical standards or engage in unethical business practices such as modern day slavery. Such associations can tarnish the organization's reputation, eroding the trust of stakeholders and customers alike.

Consequences of Overemphasizing Compliance:

Conversely, a hyper-focus on compliance without adequate consideration for added value can result in missed opportunities and suboptimal outcomes. Strict adherence to procedural norms and regulations might lead to an overly bureaucratic procurement process, hindering innovation and stifling the organization's ability to adapt swiftly to market changes.

Furthermore, an excessive emphasis on compliance might limit engagement with suppliers, stifling creativity and potential breakthroughs. For instance, a procurement team rigidly adhering to compliance protocols might miss out on collaborating with smaller, innovative suppliers that could offer unique and value-added solutions.

Strategies for Achieving Both Added Value and Compliance:

To navigate the delicate balance between added value and compliance, organizations can adopt several strategic approaches. First and foremost, an organization should establish clear procurement policies and procedures that incorporate both compliance requirements and avenues for seeking added value. This ensures that all procurement activities align with regulatory standards while leaving room for innovation.

Effective supplier management plays a pivotal role in achieving this balance. By thoroughly vetting and categorizing suppliers based on their ability to deliver value and comply with regulations, organizations can strategically align their procurement activities. For example, suppliers that have a proven track record of compliance can be trusted with critical components, while those offering innovative solutions may be engaged for projects that prioritize added value.

Leveraging technology is another essential strategy. Implementing advanced procurement software that integrates compliance checks and offers analytics for value assessment can significantly enhance the efficiency of procurement processes. Automated systems can streamline due diligence, ensuring that suppliers meet compliance standards while providing insights into their potential to deliver added value.

Additionally, fostering a culture of collaboration within the procurement team and across organizational departments is crucial. Encouraging open communication enables different stakeholders to contribute insights on compliance and added value. Cross-functional collaboration ensures that procurement decisions align with broader organizational goals and values.

In conclusion, the strategic balancing act between achieving added value and ensuring compliance in procurement is indispensable for organizational success. By recognizing the consequences of favouring one area over the other and adopting a holistic approach, this safeguards against risks but also positions the organization for sustained growth and competitiveness in the ever-evolving business landscape.

Tutor Notes:

- Examples highlight that you understand the material you have studied and can apply it to real life scenarios. You could take a certain industry or organisation and explain the consequences for them of focusing on one over the other. E.g. In the construction industry it is very important that organisations achieve compliance in their procurement activities. This includes ensuring there are robust contracts in place and that legislation such as CDM and Health and Safety is followed. When procuring a construction contract the danger of focusing on Added Value over compliance is that this may result in key legislation being forgotten which leads to legal proceedings against the buyer. For example, if the buyer procures a construction contract without fulfilling the responsibilities outlined in the CDM and H&S regulations, this can result in huge fines for the company and potential jail time for senior management.

- The risk of focusing on compliance over added value may be in missing out on alternative proposals. For example, if a buyer is procuring a construction project of a new hospital and they focus too much on compliance, they may not engage in Early Supplier Involvement or cross-functional working which may bring up alternative ideas such as different ways the hospital could be built. The alternative ideas may result in higher quality or cost savings which are missed by the buyer. This results in a more costly, or lower-quality hospital being built.

- Overall, what CIPS are testing you on here is that you understand that the procurement department should aim to achieve both – it’s a balancing act between compliance and added value and this could be viewed as a pendulum- it’s important not to swing too heavily in one direction. That’s actually a really good metaphor – feel free to use that in your conclusion!

- study guide p. 114

Electronica Manufacturing

Jane Henderson has been brought in to set up and lead a new procurement department at Electronica Manufacturing. It manufactures

a range of electronic products, components and sub-assemblies for clients in the Information technology sector.

Jane has carried out an initial analysis of procurement practices and has discovered that the company has never focused on how

procurement tools and techniques can be used to reduce costs. She is also keen to improve procurement added value, increase quality

and increase end-user satisfaction.

Jane wishes to introduce a more robust approach to procurement and is considering implementing new processes and procedures in

the procurement of raw materials and sub-assemblies.

Using the CIPS Procurement Cycle to Influence Spend on Raw Materials, Deliver Cost Reductions, and Enable Value Benefits

Electronica Manufacturing has historically not focused on procurement’s role in cost reduction or added value. By implementing the CIPS Procurement Cycle, Jane Henderson can establish a structured and strategic procurement process to optimize spend on raw materials, achieve cost reductions, and generate other value benefits. Below is a detailed analysis of how each stage of the CIPS Procurement Cycle can support these goals:

1. Understanding Needs and Developing Specifications

How it Helps:

Jane must assess raw material requirements based on product designs, production needs, and customer expectations.

Avoiding over-specification ensures that materials are fit for purpose rather than unnecessarily costly.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Prevents unnecessary spending on premium materials that don’t add value.

Ensures cost-effective sourcing without compromising quality.

2. Market Analysis and Supplier Identification

How it Helps:

Conducting supplier market research helps identify competitive suppliers offering better pricing and quality.

Analyzing market trends (e.g., commodity price fluctuations) allows for timely purchasing to mitigate cost increases.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Reduces costs by sourcing from cost-effective and reliable suppliers.

Identifies potential new suppliers that offer better value and innovation.

3. Developing a Sourcing Strategy

How it Helps:

Jane can implement strategic sourcing, using techniques like long-term contracts, supplier partnerships, and competitive bidding.

A well-defined strategy ensures that procurement aligns with business goals.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Reduces supply chain risks by diversifying suppliers.

Maximizes cost savings through bulk purchasing and supplier negotiations.

4. Supplier Evaluation and Selection

How it Helps:

A structured evaluation process ensures selection based on cost, quality, reliability, and sustainability.

Supplier benchmarking and total cost analysis ensure best-value sourcing.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Reduces waste and costs by selecting suppliers that provide consistent quality.

Helps mitigate supply chain risks, ensuring reliable raw material availability.

5. Contract Management and Negotiation

How it Helps:

Jane can introduce structured contracts with cost-control mechanisms, such as fixed pricing, volume discounts, and service-level agreements (SLAs).

Contract negotiation can lock in competitive pricing and ensure supplier accountability.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Improves cost predictability and budget control.

Strengthens supplier relationships, leading to better terms and cost efficiencies.

6. Purchase Order Processing and Expediting

How it Helps:

Implementing an efficient purchase order (PO) system reduces administrative inefficiencies and speeds up raw material procurement.

Use of automated procurement systems (e.g., ERP systems) ensures cost-effective order processing.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Reduces administrative overheads and human errors.

Ensures faster lead times and better inventory control, reducing stock shortages and excess inventory costs.

7. Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)

How it Helps:

Establishing collaborative relationships with key suppliers can drive joint cost-saving initiatives.

Long-term supplier partnerships can lead to better pricing, innovation, and risk-sharing.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Reduces costs through supplier-led efficiency improvements.

Encourages supplier innovation, leading to better materials and higher-quality products.

8. Performance Review and Supplier Development

How it Helps:

Regular supplier performance reviews ensure that quality, cost, and delivery expectations are met.

Supplier development programs can help underperforming suppliers improve efficiency, reducing procurement risks.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Improves product quality and consistency, reducing defects and waste-related costs.

Enhances supplier accountability, leading to more cost-effective procurement.

9. Risk Management and Compliance

How it Helps:

Jane can introduce risk management strategies such as dual sourcing, inventory buffers, and price hedging to mitigate supply chain disruptions.

Ensuring compliance with ethical, legal, and sustainability standards reduces long-term operational risks.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Reduces financial and operational risks, improving business continuity.

Strengthens brand reputation by ensuring ethical sourcing.

10. Procurement and Supply Strategy Review

How it Helps:

Continuous evaluation of procurement strategies ensures alignment with changing market conditions and company goals.

Data-driven decision-making through spend analysis and procurement reporting allows for ongoing cost optimizations.

Impact on Electronica Manufacturing:

Enhances procurement efficiency and sustains cost reductions.

Ensures procurement remains a value-adding function rather than a cost center.

Conclusion

By applying the CIPS Procurement Cycle, Jane Henderson can transform Electronica Manufacturing’s procurement function from an ad-hoc, cost-inefficient process into a strategic, value-driven function. This structured approach will enable smarter spending on raw materials, continuous cost reductions, and broader business benefits, such as improved quality, efficiency, and stakeholder satisfaction.

Implementing procurement best practices will not only reduce costs but also drive long-term business sustainability and competitive advantage.

Essay Plan:

Definition of Stakeholder- someone who has a ‘stake’ or interest in the company. A person or organisation who influences and can be influenced by the company.

Categories of stakeholders:

1) Internal Stakeholders- these people work inside the company e.g. employees, managers etc

2) Connected- these people work with the company e.g. suppliers, mortgage lenders

3) External Stakeholders – these people are outside of the company e.g. the government, professional bodies, the local community.

Example Essay:

A stakeholder is an individual, group, or entity that has a vested interest or concern in the activities, decisions, or outcomes of an organization or project. Stakeholders are those who can be affected by or can affect the organization, and they play a crucial role in influencing its success, sustainability, and reputation. Understanding and managing stakeholder relationships is a fundamental aspect of effective organizational governance and decision-making and there are several different types of stakeholders.

Firstly, internal stakeholders are those individuals or groups directly connected to the daily operations and management of the organization. Internal stakeholders are key to success and are arguably more vested in the company succeeding. They may depend on the company for their income / livelihood. Anyone who contributes to the company's internal functions can be considered an internal stakeholder for example:

This category includes

1) Employees: With a direct influence on the organization's success, employees are critical internal stakeholders. Their engagement, satisfaction, and productivity impact the overall performance.

2) Management and Executives: The leadership team has a significant influence on the organization's strategic direction and decision-making. Their decisions can shape the company's future.

Secondly, connected stakeholders are those individuals or groups whose interests are tied to the organization but may not be directly involved in its day-to-day operations. Connected stakeholders work alongside the organisation and often have a contractual relationship with the organisation. For example, banks, mortgage lenders, and suppliers. These stakeholders have an interest in the business succeeding, but not as much as internal stakeholders. It is important to keep these stakeholders satisfied as the organisation does depend on them to some extent. For example, it is important that the organisation has a good relationship with their bank / mortgage provider/ supplier as failing to pay what they owe may result in the stakeholders taking legal action against the organisation.

This category includes:

1) Shareholders/Investors: Holding financial stakes in the organization, shareholders seek a return on their investment and have a vested interest in the company's financial performance.

2) Suppliers and Partners: External entities providing goods, services, or collaboration. Their relationship with the organization impacts the quality and efficiency of its operations.

Lastly external stakeholders are entities outside the organization that can influence or be influenced by its actions. This category includes anyone who is affected by the company but who does not contribute to internal operations. They have less power to influence decisions than internal and connected stakeholders. External stakeholders include the government, professional bodies, pressure groups and the local community. They have quite diverse objectives and have varying ability to influence the organisation. For example, the government may be able to influence the organisation by passing legislation that regulates the industry but they do not have the power to get involved in the day-to-day affairs of the company. Pressure groups may have varying degrees of success in influencing the organisation depending on the subject matter. This category includes:

1) Customers: With a direct impact on the organization's revenue, customers are vital external stakeholders. Their satisfaction and loyalty are crucial for the company's success.

2) Government and Regulatory Bodies: External entities overseeing industry regulations. Compliance with these regulations is crucial for the organization's reputation and legal standing.

In conclusion, stakeholders are diverse entities with a vested interest in an organization's activities. The three categories—internal, connected and external —encompass various groups that significantly influence and are influenced by the organization. Recognizing and addressing the needs and concerns of stakeholders are vital for sustainable and responsible business practices.

Tutor Notes

- The above essay is pretty short and to the point and would pass. If you want to beef out the essay you can include some of the following information for a higher score:

- Stakeholders can be harmed by, or benefit from the organisation (can affect and be affected by the organisation). For example a stakeholder can be harmed if the organisation becomes involved in illegal or immoral practices- e.g. the local community can suffer if the organisation begins to pollute the local rivers. The local community can also benefit from the organisation through increased employment levels.

- CSR argues organisations should respect the rights of stakeholder groups

- Stakeholders are important because they may have direct or indirect influence on decisions

- The public sector has a wider and more complex range of stakeholders as they’re managed on behalf of society as a whole. They’re more likely to take a rage of stakeholder views into account when making decisions. However, these stakeholders are less powerful – i.e. they can’t threaten market sanctions, to withdraw funding, or to quit the business etc.

- The essay doesn’t specifically ask you to Map Stakeholders, but you could throw in a cheeky mention of Mendelow’s Stakeholder Matrix, perhaps in the conclusion. Don’t spend time describing it though- you won’t get more than 1 point for mentioning it. You’d be better off spending your time giving lots and lots of examples of different types of stakeholders.

- Study guide p. 58

(a) Five Procedures to Include in BetaCo’s Procurement Policy Manual

Purchase Requisition and Approval Procedure

All procurement requests must be formally submitted through standardized purchase requisition forms and approved by designated authorities before any purchase action is taken.

This ensures control over spending and adherence to budgets.

Supplier Selection and Evaluation Procedure

A structured process to identify, assess, and approve suppliers based on criteria such as quality, reliability, price, and compliance with BetaCo’s standards.

Supplier performance should be regularly reviewed to maintain quality and reliability.

Purchase Order (PO) Management Procedure

Clear guidelines on raising, issuing, and tracking purchase orders to suppliers, ensuring orders are placed only after necessary approvals and conform to agreed terms.

Purchase orders serve as formal contracts protecting both BetaCo and suppliers.

Invoice Processing and Payment Procedure

Defines steps for receiving, verifying, and authorizing supplier invoices, followed by timely payment according to agreed payment terms.

This avoids late payments and maintains good supplier relationships.

Conflict of Interest and Ethics Compliance Procedure

Policies requiring employees to declare any conflicts of interest and adhere to ethical standards in procurement activities to ensure transparency and fairness.

This prevents fraud, corruption, and protects BetaCo’s reputation.

(b) Analysis of How TWO Procedures Positively Influence Procurement Activities and Organisational Outcomes for BetaCo

1. Purchase Requisition and Approval Procedure

Positive Influence on Procurement Activities:Introducing a formal purchase requisition and approval procedure provides BetaCo with much-needed control and oversight over spending, addressing the current issue of overspending by project teams. It ensures that all procurement requests are validated against project budgets and company policies before any purchase commitment is made.

Impact on Organisational Outcomes:This procedure supports financial discipline and accountability, reducing uncontrolled expenditures and improving cost management. It also creates a clear audit trail for procurement decisions, helping senior management monitor and enforce compliance, thus reducing organisational risk.

2. Invoice Processing and Payment Procedure

Positive Influence on Procurement Activities:By implementing a standardized invoice verification and timely payment procedure, BetaCo can resolve the existing problem of late payments to suppliers. This ensures invoices are matched to purchase orders and delivery notes, approved promptly, and paid within agreed terms.

Impact on Organisational Outcomes:Timely payments strengthen supplier relationships, enhancing trust and reliability in supply continuity, which is critical for BetaCo’s growing customer base and production needs. It also helps avoid disputes or disruptions caused by delayed payments, contributing to smoother operations and better supplier cooperation.

Conclusion:

For BetaCo, incorporating structured procurement procedures into the policy manual is essential for centralising control, improving transparency, and reducing risks associated with decentralized procurement activities. Specifically, purchase requisition and approval alongside invoice processing procedures will directly address current challenges, leading to improved financial control, supplier relationships, and operational efficiency, ultimately supporting BetaCo’s growth ambitions and reputation.

What to include in the essay:

- Definition of added value: the economic enhancement given to products or services before offering them to customers. Examples may include a product which has additional features at no additional cost to the customer or the provision of an extended warrantee.

- Description of four of the following with examples and Explanation: s: providing better customer service levels, risk management, cost control and reduction, relationship management, reputation management, innovation, use of technology, streamlining processes, improving specifications, increasing sustainability, improving quality, ordering processes such as bulk ordering, inventory management, improving the product from the customer’s perspective (e.g. packaging, exclusivity), sustainability, convenience, market development.

Example essay:

Added value in procurement refers to the enhancement or improvement in the economic worth, quality, or utility of products or services before they are offered to customers or end-users. In the context of procurement, the goal is to go beyond simply obtaining goods or services at the lowest cost. Instead, procurement aims to contribute additional value to the organization through various means. This essay explores the concept of added value and outlines four ways the Procurement Department can contribute to organizational improvement.

Improving Specifications

Procurement can add value firstly by ensuring all critical items are procured against a specification, and secondly by improving and regularly updating those specifications. For example, the procurement department might be responsible for procuring light-bulbs for an office. Having an effective specification for this purchase (lightbulbs must meet X safety standard and Y environmental standard) would result in less maverick buying for the organisation and the procurement of a better-quality product. Furthermore, regularly updating specifications ensures that purchases are made against current safety standards and regulations (e.g. the use of low-energy lightbulbs). If procurement don’t update specifications, then there is a risk that items are bought that don’t meet the correct standards. Added value in this regard could also therefore be considered the removal of risks of procuring the wrong item.

Stream-lining Processes

Procurement can add value by stream-lining processes such as requisitions and POs. This reduces the time it takes to procure an item, thus saving the company money. Another process that could be streamlined is the re-ordering process of regularly bought items. This could be automated when the stock levels reach a certain level. For example if an organisation requires its staff to wear PPE, an automatic request could be made once there are only 50 face masks left.

Managing Supplier Relationships

Having strong, positive relationships with suppliers is a source of added value as it means suppliers value you as a buyer and are therefore more likely to help in situations which are adversely affecting business. For example, if a manufacturer puts an order in for 300 items with their supplier but then realises that they have made an error in the amount, if there is a strong relationship, the supplier may allow the buyer to amend the order after the fact. If there is a poor relationship, the supplier may not be as flexible. The flexibility in the supply chain is therefore a source of added value.

Improving Quality / Innovation

This involves adding value from the customer’s perspective. E.g. a customer may choose to purchase a phone that has a longer battery life than others. Procurement’s role in this may be in completing a Value Engineering exercise or procuring higher quality components or materials at the same price in order to achieve this additional feature.

In conclusion, the Procurement Department plays a crucial role in organizational success by adding value through improved specifications, streamlined processes, strong supplier relationships, and a focus on quality and innovation. These strategies contribute to enhanced efficiency, reduced risks, and increased customer satisfaction, making procurement an essential function for organizational excellence.

Tutor Notes

- The question asks specifically to name 4 ways of adding value. You therefore won’t get any additional points if you talk about 5 or 6, even though it may be tempting. Instead, focus your response on providing more information on the 4 you have chosen and bulking out your answer with examples. This demonstrates to the examiner that you fully understand the topic AND that you can apply the theory to real situations.

- You could use real-life examples from your own organisation/ experience or you could give a hypothetical situation such as a cake manufacturer. You could talk through how the procurement department at the cake manufacturer can add value by doing the four things in your essay: by amending the specification so the cakes are more tasty, by streamlining the process for ordering flour, by managing the relationship with the company that fixes the machines when they break down, and by introducing innovation such as using an e-procurement system to source raw materials and the benefits that these will bring to the organisation.

- Added value is part of the syllabus for Learning Outcome 1.2 starting from p.19 but I’m gonna be honest, I think the new study guide is a bit crap on this part of the syllabus. The section starts talking about the 5 rights of procurement and I think that makes things very confusing for students. The 5 rights and added value are linked subjects, but they’re not the same. Getting the rights right, CAN lead to sources of added value, but added value is value that is IN ADDITION to what is expected. So, when you have a question on added value, focus on stuff that’s listed under 1.1.4 ‘other sources of added value’ on p.35 rather than talking about the 5 rights of procurement. My list at the top is more exhaustive than the one in the study guide.

- If you’re looking to be really clever you can quote Michael Porter on ‘what is added value?’. Michael Porter looks at this from a customer perspective - ‘added value’ refers to the addition of greater value (either by reducing the cost to produce it, or by adding something that customers are willing to pay more for). These could be; marketing / design, customer service, maintenance, delivery etc. This comes up at Level 5 / 6.

- This is essentially two mini essays, so you can do them completely separately if you like.

1) Definition of centralised procurement – when an organisation has a designated procurement function which makes purchases on behalf of other teams. When departments need to make a purchase, they would do this by approaching the procurement department who would purchase the item they need. This is in contrast to devolved procurement where departments can make purchases themselves.

2) Explanation: of 2 forms of hybrid structures- there’s a couple in the study guide you can pick from – consortium, shared services, lead buyer and outsourced. In the old syllabus they used to discuss SCAN – Strategically Controlled Action Network and CLAN = Centre Led Action Network. This has been removed from the new syllabus, but I don’t think it would be wrong to use SCAN and CLAN in this essay if you wanted to. However they are more complicated than the others and if you can talk about other models instead I’d definitely go for that.

Example Essay:

Centralized procurement refers to a procurement strategy where an organization consolidates its purchasing activities into a single, central department or unit. Instead of allowing individual departments or divisions within the organization to independently manage their procurement processes, centralized procurement involves the concentration of these activities under a unified structure.

Key features of centralized procurement include:

1) Single Procurement Authority: In a centralized procurement system, there is a designated procurement authority or department responsible for handling all purchasing decisions. This central entity has the authority to negotiate contracts, select suppliers, and make procurement-related decisions on behalf of the entire organization.

2) Streamlined Processes: Centralized procurement aims to standardize and streamline procurement processes across the organization. This can include the establishment of uniform procurement policies, procedures, and documentation to ensure consistency and efficiency.

3) Economies of Scale: By consolidating purchasing power, centralized procurement allows organizations to leverage economies of scale. Bulk purchases, standardized contracts, and negotiations with suppliers on a larger scale can lead to cost savings and more favourable terms.

4) Improved Coordination and Communication: Centralized procurement enhances coordination and communication within the organization. With a centralized structure, there is better visibility into overall procurement activities, allowing for improved collaboration, information sharing, and strategic planning. Moreover, this centralized control helps manage risks, ensure transparency, and monitor adherence to ethical and legal standards.

5) Consolidated Supplier Relationships: Centralized procurement enables the organization to consolidate its relationships with suppliers. This can lead to stronger partnerships, better negotiation positions, and improved collaboration with a select group of suppliers that meet the organization's needs.

6) Strategic Decision-Making: Centralized procurement allows organizations to make strategic decisions at a higher level. This includes aligning procurement strategies with overall organizational goals, optimizing the supply chain, and contributing to broader business objectives.

An example of centralised procurement would be in a hotel chain with several hotels across the UK. In a centralised procurement function there would be one team responsible for ordering everything for all of the hotels, rather than allowing the individual hotels to buy things themselves. Premier Inn is an example of a company that uses this structure- it allows them to buy stock in bulk and ensures that all hotels have the same equipment so customers expectations are always met.

Centralized procurement is often contrasted with decentralized procurement, where individual departments or business units manage their procurement independently (i.e. each hotel would buy their own supplies). The choice between centralized and decentralized procurement depends on various factors, including the size and structure of the organization, the nature of its operations, and the specific goals it aims to achieve through its procurement processes.

Consortium Procurement Model:

The consortium procurement model is characterized by the collaboration of multiple organizations forming a joint group (the consortium) to engage in collective buying activities. Typically composed of entities from the same industry or sector, these organizations unite their resources, expertise, and purchasing power to pursue shared procurement objectives. The consortium leverages this collective strength to negotiate contracts, conduct bulk purchases, and benefit from economies of scale, resulting in cost savings and increased operational efficiency. The UK University sector is an example of Consortium activities- many universities come together to ‘group buy’ items as this brings about many benefits.

The main benefit of this form of hybrid procurement model is the increased negotiating power and leverage derived from combining the purchasing volumes of participating entities. This often results in more favourable terms, competitive prices (through bulk purchases), and improved conditions with suppliers. Additionally, consortium buying allows organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise, fostering a collaborative environment that enhances overall procurement capabilities. By working together, consortium members can collectively address challenges, negotiate strategically, and navigate the procurement landscape more effectively.

However, consortium buying is not without its challenges. A potential disadvantage lies in the complexity of managing a collaborative procurement structure, involving coordination among diverse entities. Achieving consensus on procurement strategies, vendor selection, and contract terms may require considerable effort and compromise. Additionally, individual organizational needs and preferences within the consortium may differ, posing challenges in aligning priorities. It is essential to strike a balance between centralized decision-making and accommodating the specific requirements of each consortium member. Furthermore, the success of consortium buying relies heavily on effective communication and trust among participants. Any breakdown in communication or lack of trust could hinder the collaborative process, impacting the overall efficiency and success of the consortium's procurement endeavours.

Overall, while consortium buying offers notable advantages, its effectiveness is contingent on careful management of collaborative dynamics and effective communication strategies.

Shared Services Procurement Model:

In the shared services procurement model, various departments or business units within a single organization converge under a centralized procurement function. Rather than individual units managing their procurement independently, a dedicated shared services centre is established to provide procurement-related services across the organization. This model facilitates streamlined processes, ensures consistency through standardized procedures, and capitalizes on economies of scale.

One key benefit is the potential for cost savings through economies of scale. By centralizing procurement, the organization can negotiate bulk purchases and standardized contracts, leading to better terms and prices. This consolidation of purchasing power enables the organization to optimize its resources and achieve overall cost efficiency. Additionally, centralized procurement allows for streamlined processes, standardized procedures, and better control over procurement activities. It promotes consistency, reduces redundancy, and ensures adherence to organizational policies and compliance requirements.

However, there are also potential disadvantages to centralized procurement. One notable challenge is the potential for reduced flexibility in meeting the unique needs of individual departments or business units within the organization. Centralization may lead to standardized approaches that might not be well-suited for all units, potentially impacting their specific requirements. Furthermore, the centralization of decision-making can result in increased bureaucracy and longer decision-making processes, potentially slowing down procurement activities. Additionally, there may be resistance from decentralized units that are accustomed to managing their procurement independently. Striking a balance between centralized control and accommodating the diverse needs of various units is crucial for the success of centralized procurement.

In conclusion, both the consortium and shared services procurement models represent strategies to enhance efficiency, realize cost savings, and optimize procurement processes. While the consortium model involves collaboration with external entities, the shared services model centralizes procurement functions within a single organization. The choice between these models depends on the unique goals, structure, and requirements of the organizations involved, each offering distinct advantages in the pursuit of effective procurement management.

Tutor Notes:

- This is from LO 3.3 p.161 onwards. There’s quite a bit of information on these hybrid models so there’s many ways it can come up as a question. There are different types of consortium, which I didn’t go into in the above essay because it wasn’t asked for as part of the question, but I’d familiarise yourself with this. Also with the pros and cons of each model, and think about when an organisation may choose this type of model.