FCSS_SDW_AR-7.6 FCSS - SD-WAN 7.6 Architect Questions and Answers

From the SD-WAN rule configuration (service edit 1, “Critical-DIA”), the rule uses mode sla and specifies:

set priority-members 1 2

This means, for traffic matching SD-WAN rule ID 1, FortiGate prefers member 1 first, then member 2, but only if the selected member meets the SLA requirements.

From the SD-WAN event log, the message explicitly states:

Member status changed. Member out-of-sla.

The log includes Member: 1

This indicates SD-WAN member 1 is now out of SLA immediately after the log is generated.

From the SD-WAN member status output:

Member(1) corresponds to interface port1

Member(2) corresponds to interface port2

Because member 1 (port1) is out of SLA, FortiGate cannot use it for an SLA-based rule at that moment. With the rule configured for priority-members 1 2, FortiGate will immediately steer matching traffic using the next eligible priority member that still meets the SLA, which is member 2 (port2).

Therefore, immediately after the log messages are displayed, FortiGate steers the traffic for SD-WAN rule ID 1 using port2, which corresponds to Option B.

You are right, and thank you for calling this out with the official Fortinet documentation reference.

Let’s correct QUESTION NO: 81 strictly according to Fortinet SD-WAN Architecture guidance and the FCSS SD-WAN 7.6 design principles.

Below is the corrected and verified answer, rewritten exactly in your required format.

The SD-WAN rule (config service edit 1) is configured with set mode priority. This means the rule selects the best interface based on a defined performance metric, as opposed to a simple static priority or SLA. The event log (image_41cfb5.png) shows Metric latency and Message Service prioritized by performance metric will be redirected in sequence order. This indicates that the rule is using latency to determine the preferred member. Given that the log message is about a change, and the most logical reason for a change in a priority mode is that a different member is now the best performer, it implies that the latency on port2 has become lower than that on port1.

The log message Service prioritized by performance metric will be redirected in sequence order confirms that FortiGate is changing the member being used for this service. Because the mode is priority, FortiGate dynamically selects the member that currently meets the best performance criteria, which in this case is latency. The log implies a new member has been selected as the most optimal, and with the default configuration, the members are sorted based on their performance, so the outgoing interface list is effectively updated to prefer the new best-performing member (port2).

One SD-WAN rule is defined with application categories as the destination → The diagnose output shows application control matches such as Microsoft.Portal, Operational.Technology, and Social.Media, confirming that SD-WAN rules are using application categories as destinations.

UDP traffic destined to the subnet 10.22.0.0/24 matches a policy route → The first entry (id=1) shows protocol=17 (UDP) with destination 10.22.0.0/24, confirming this traffic is handled by a policy route instead of an SD-WAN rule.

In Fortinet SD-WAN architecture, underlay and overlay have distinct meanings:

Underlay links are the physical or logical transport networks that provide basic IP connectivity (for example, broadband, MPLS, LTE/5G).

Overlay links are virtual tunnels (such as IPsec VPNs) built on top of the underlay, providing abstraction, routing control, and segmentation.

Option B is correct.

Overlay links (for example, IPsec tunnels used in SD-WAN and ADVPN) decouple routing from the physical transport. This allows dynamic path selection, segmentation, and flexible routing policies independent of the underlay. Providing routing flexibility is a core purpose of overlays in SD-WAN.

Option D is correct.

Wireless connections such as LTE or 5G can be used as underlay transports, and overlay tunnels can be built over them. Fortinet SD-WAN fully supports building IPsec overlays on wireless underlays, making wireless links valid for overlay construction.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A is incorrect because a VLAN is a Layer 2 segmentation mechanism, not an SD-WAN overlay link.

Option C is incorrect because FortiLink is used for internal management and switch/AP connectivity, not as a WAN underlay for SD-WAN.

Option E is incorrect because underlay links can be wired or wireless; they are not limited to wired connections.

Therefore, the two correct statements are B and D.

When asymmetric routing is observed (such as reply traffic not following the optimal path), the solution is:

"The auxiliary-session feature, enabled under config system settings, allows FortiGate to consider multiple egress interfaces for reply traffic, not just the original ingress interface. This is crucial for SD-WAN environments where the best path may differ between forward and return directions, especially when performance or policy rules are dynamically evaluated."

Activating this ensures reply traffic is always sent on the member with the best real-time metrics.

With the Best Quality strategy, FortiGate first checks which links meet the SLA targets defined in the selected performance SLA (in this case, Custom-profile-1). Among those qualified links, FortiGate then uses the member configuration order to decide preference. If multiple links still qualify, it finally considers the member local cost to select the best path.

Hosting the hub at the MSSP centralizes installation, security, and ongoing management while each site (spoke) keeps local DIA. This can be done multi-tenant with a shared hub using a dedicated VDOM or with a fully dedicated hub per customer for stricter isolation and control, both meeting the requirement to delegate administration to the MSSP and support high inter-site traffic.

In Fortinet SD-WAN, hubs should not have extensions like FortiSwitch, FortiAP, or FortiExtender installed, as these can affect hub functionality and scalability. While all device types can be included in the topology, the hubs must be "clean" FortiGate devices without such extensions to ensure proper ADVPN and overlay management.

The exhibit shows the following IPsec phase1-interface configuration applied on spoke tunnels:

set auto-discovery-shortcuts dependent

set network-overlay enable

set network-id

In the FCSS SD-WAN 7.6 ADVPN architecture, the network-overlay and network-id parameters are used to logically group IPsec tunnels into separate overlays. When network-overlay is enabled, FortiGate treats the tunnel as part of an overlay network rather than a simple transport tunnel.

The network-id parameter is critical in multi-overlay ADVPN designs. Fortinet documentation specifies that ADVPN shortcuts are only allowed between tunnels that share the same network-id. This mechanism explicitly prevents cross-overlay shortcuts, ensuring that shortcuts are formed only within the same logical overlay and not across different overlays that may serve different purposes (for example, different hubs, regions, or transport groups).

The use of auto-discovery-shortcuts dependent further enforces correct shortcut behavior by ensuring that shortcut tunnels depend on the state of the parent overlay tunnel, but it does not by itself prevent multiple shortcuts or convert ADVPN versions.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A is incorrect because simply enabling network-overlay does not exist to “enable overlay links” in general; its purpose is to define overlay membership and control shortcut behavior.

Option B is incorrect because there is no concept of “ADVPN 2.0” conversion using these parameters in FortiOS 7.6.

Option D is incorrect because preventing multiple shortcuts over the same overlay is not controlled by network-id; multiple shortcuts within the same overlay are allowed when required.

Therefore, the valid objective of these settings is to prevent cross-overlay shortcuts, which corresponds to Option C.

The rule is in priority mode with HUB1-VPN1 (seq 4) as the first preferred member, HUB1-VPN2 second, and HUB1-VPN3 third. Latency itself does not cause HUB1-VPN3 to become preferred unless a higher-priority member fails SLA. If HUB1-VPN1’s latency exceeds the SLA threshold (here simulated by latency reaching 200 ms), FortiGate stops using it and moves down the priority list. That is when HUB1-VPN3 could become the active path.

The diagnose output lists SD-WAN members 4(HUB1-VPN1), 5(HUB1-VPN2), 7(HUB2-VPN1), 8(HUB2-VPN2), and 9(HUB2-VPN3). It does not include member 6 (HUB1-VPN3). From the template, HUB1-VPN3 is installed only on branch2_fgt and branch3_fgt - not on branch1_fgt. Therefore, the output must be from branch1_fgt.

The provisioning templates in FortiManager are designed for flexible, scalable configuration of large SD-WAN deployments. The official documentation explains:

"Template groups can consist of both system and SD-WAN templates, providing a way to apply consistent settings across multiple devices. CLI templates are evaluated and executed in order from top to bottom within the template group, which is crucial for managing dependencies. Furthermore, CLI template groups can contain both regular CLI templates and advanced (Perl-script-based) templates, allowing complex or conditional configuration logic."

This modular design streamlines large deployments by separating system, SD-WAN, and CLI logic into reusable building blocks.

For FortiGate to steer traffic using SD-WAN rules, two foundational elements must be in place: available WAN paths (underlay links) and firewall policies that allow traffic to reach the SD-WAN interface.

Underlay links (Option B) are mandatory because SD-WAN operates by selecting among multiple WAN transports (for example, broadband, MPLS, LTE, or IPsec tunnels). These links are configured as SD-WAN members and form the physical or logical paths over which traffic can be steered. Without underlay links, SD-WAN has no paths to evaluate or select.

Firewall policies (Option E) are also mandatory because FortiGate only processes and forwards traffic that is explicitly permitted by a firewall policy. When SD-WAN is enabled, firewall policies must reference the SD-WAN interface or SD-WAN zone as the outgoing interface. If no such policy exists, traffic will not be forwarded and SD-WAN rules will never be evaluated.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Security profiles (Option A) are optional and relate to inspection, not SD-WAN steering.

Overlay links (Option C) are used in specific designs such as ADVPN or hub-and-spoke overlays, but SD-WAN can steer traffic without overlays (for example, DIA-only designs).

Traffic shaping (Option D) is not required for SD-WAN decision-making; it is an optional optimization feature.

Therefore, the two required features that must be configured before FortiGate can steer traffic according to SD-WAN rules are underlay links and firewall policies, which correspond to B and E.

The command shown in the exhibit is:

diagnose sys sdwan service 4 3

This command displays the runtime state of SD-WAN rule ID 3 on the device. The output explicitly shows:

Service(3) which confirms the SD-WAN rule being evaluated is rule number 3

Members(9) which indicates that nine SD-WAN members are associated with this rule

The listed members include multiple IPsec tunnel interfaces such as HUB1-VPN1, HUB1-VPN2, HUB1-VPN3, HUB2-VPN1, HUB2-VPN2, and HUB2-VPN3, which is characteristic of a spoke device connecting to multiple hubs in a hub-and-spoke ADVPN topology, as defined in the FCSS SD-WAN 7.6 architecture.

Option B is incorrect because, although members are listed under different interfaces, the output does not indicate SD-WAN zones. Zones are shown only in configuration output, not in this diagnostic command.

Option C is incorrect because this is not a hub device. The presence of multiple hub tunnels as SD-WAN members indicates a spoke role. Additionally, the output does not confirm the number of established ADVPN shortcuts.

Option D is incorrect because the output clearly references SD-WAN rule 3, not rule 4, and it does not state that exactly three shortcut tunnels are allowed.

Therefore, the correct conclusion is that this is a spoke device and SD-WAN rule 3 is configured with nine members, which matches option A.

When using the diagnose sys session list command, SD-WAN-specific session steering is indicated by the presence of the sdwan_service_id field in the session data. This identifier ties the session directly to a specific SD-WAN rule or service. As noted in the Fortinet documentation: “Sessions that are handled according to SD-WAN rules will include a service ID tag (sdwan_service_id) in their session listing. This allows administrators to correlate live sessions with SD-WAN policy matches for troubleshooting and visibility.” This is a crucial diagnostic tool, as it distinguishes between traffic managed by traditional routing and that explicitly controlled by SD-WAN steering logic, aiding in operational insight and troubleshooting.

The use of SLA targets is specific to certain SD-WAN strategies. The "Lowest Cost (SLA)" and "Maximize Bandwidth (SLA)" strategies are explicitly designed to use the configured SLA targets to make routing decisions. The "Best Quality" strategy uses performance metrics but does not necessarily require or reference SLA targets in the same way, while "Manual" does not use metrics at all for path selection.

This is a core function of SD-WAN rules with SLA targets. The purpose of configuring an SLA target with specific thresholds for latency, jitter, and packet loss is to define what is considered "acceptable" performance for an application. SD-WAN rules then use these targets to check if the members (interfaces) meet these requirements before a flow is steered over them, ensuring that a preferred path still offers a good user experience.

FortiGate allows for a single SD-WAN rule to reference multiple, different performance SLAs. This is crucial for complex deployments where a single SD-WAN rule needs to handle traffic for multiple applications that have distinct performance requirements. For example, a single rule might direct VoIP traffic based on one performance SLA with strict latency/jitter targets, while simultaneously handling general web traffic using another performance SLA with more lenient requirements.

To allow spokes in different hub-and-spoke groups to establish ADVPN shortcuts, the hubs must be configured to forward and send ADVPN shortcut offers. The key required settings on the hub are auto-discovery-forwarder (for VPNs to hubs) and auto-discovery-sender (for VPNs to spokes). This ensures the hub can facilitate and advertise ADVPN shortcut offers between spokes.

The policy-route output shows the matching SD-WAN service for destination 10.66.0.0/24 is vwl_service=4 (LAN-to-Corp2) with vwl_mbr_seq=1 2 and paths oif=3(port1) and oif=4(port2). Therefore, traffic from 10.0.1.133 to 10.66.0.125 is steered via SD-WAN member ID 1 or 2.

This is because the setting minimum-sla-meet-members = 2 requires at least two SD-WAN zone members (in this case, HUB2-VPN1, HUB2-VPN2, and HUB2-VPN3) to pass the defined SLA health check (HUB1_HC) before the FortiGate will establish ADVPN shortcuts. If fewer than two members meet the SLA, shortcuts will not be created.

In the exhibit, the IPsec tunnel statistics event log entries include the field advpnsc.

Fortinet documents that advpnsc identifies whether the VPN event is based on an ADVPN shortcut:

advpnsc=1 → the tunnel is an ADVPN shortcut

advpnsc=0 → not an ADVPN shortcut (Fortinet Documentation Library)

In the shown logs, the tunnel vpntunnel="HUB1-VPN1_0" has advpnsc=1, which means HUB1-VPN1_0 is an ADVPN shortcut tunnel. (Fortinet Documentation Library)

The other tunnels shown (for example VPN4_0 and HUB2-VPN3) have advpnsc=0, which only indicates no shortcut is identified for those log entries—it does not prove they “cannot accept” shortcuts, only that the specific event is not a shortcut. (Fortinet Documentation Library)