ITIL ITIL-4-Specialist-High-velocity-IT Dumps Questions Answers

Kanban is specifically designed to improve flow by visualizing work, limiting work in progress, and helping teams identify bottlenecks. In this scenario, the problem is not lack of effort but poor flow discipline. Too much simultaneous work causes delay, context switching, and reduced throughput.

Chaos engineering is for resilience testing. Shift-left testing improves early quality control. Service level management focuses on agreed service targets. None of those addresses the core issue as directly as Kanban.

Therefore A is the best answer.

=========

The scenario says the attack was identified quickly and systems were restored without significant loss. That means detection and corrective response were relatively effective. The weakness was that the attacker was able to gain access in the first place.

Therefore, the type of control needing improvement is prevention. This could include stronger identity protection, user awareness, multi-factor authentication, credential monitoring, and better social engineering resistance.

D is correct because the issue occurred before the detection stage; the preventive safeguards were insufficient.

=========

The organization has already identified alternate sites, backup capabilities, and manual workarounds. The major remaining gap is proving that these arrangements will actually work when needed. The best next step is to test the continuity plan.

A plan can look good on paper and still fail under real conditions. Testing validates roles, dependencies, timing, recovery assumptions, communication paths, and the practical usability of backup and recovery methods. In HVIT, resilient operations depend on evidence-based confidence, not just documented intentions.

A is useful but insufficient. B appears partly addressed already through backup capabilities. D may matter, but it does not complete the continuity capability in the way testing does. So C is the strongest answer.

=========