F5 F5CAB3 Dumps Questions Answers

This scenario describes a classic routing issue often encountered during SSL offload deployments. The fact that an SSL connection is established indicates the Client SSL profile is working correctly. The packet trace showing the server "receives and responds" to the request is the most critical diagnostic clue.

When a BIG-IP receives traffic, it typically passes the client's original source IP address to the backend server. If the backend server's default gateway is not the BIG-IP (a common "one-arm" network topology), the server will attempt to send its response directly back to the client's IP via its own default router. The client's browser will reject this response because it expects traffic to come from the Virtual Server's IP, not the backend server's IP.

To resolve this, the administrator must enable SNAT (Source Address Translation), typically using SNAT Automap. When SNAT is enabled, the BIG-IP replaces the client's original source IP with one of its own Self IPs before forwarding the request to the server. Because the source of the packet is now the BIG-IP, the backend server is forced to send its response back to the BIG-IP. The BIG-IP then receives the response, translates it back, and delivers the content to the user. Option A is unnecessary if the servers are expecting plain-text traffic after the BIG-IP performs offload. Option D would only worsen the existing routing discrepancy.

For HTTP-based applications, cookie persistence is the most appropriate and commonly recommended persistence method.

According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:

Cookie persistence inserts or uses an HTTP cookie to maintain session affinity.

It operates at Layer 7 (HTTP) and is application-aware.

It allows persistence to be maintained even when multiple clients are behind a NAT device.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Destination addressDestination address persistence is generally used for inbound traffic patterns such as firewall or proxy scenarios.

B. Hash persistenceHash persistence is less granular and not HTTP-specific.

C. SSL persistenceSSL persistence is typically used when SSL session IDs are reused and is less reliable than cookies for HTTP applications.

Correct Resolution:

Using cookie persistence ensures that HTTP web requests are consistently directed to the same pool member.

F5 provides several pre-configured (built-in) TCP profiles designed to optimize traffic for different network conditions. When an administrator is looking to improve general performance but does not have a specific, narrow use case (like strictly mobile or strictly long-haul WAN), the f5-tcp-progressive profile is the recommended starting point.

The f5-tcp-progressive profile is designed as a modern, high-performance replacement for the older default TCP settings. It incorporates several advanced congestion control algorithms and buffer management techniques that allow it to adapt dynamically to varying network latencies and packet loss scenarios. Unlike f5-tcp-legacy (Option A), which uses older, less efficient stacks, the progressive profile leverages modern TMM (Traffic Management Microkernel) optimizations.

While f5-tcp-mobile (Option B) is highly effective for high-loss cellular networks and f5-tcp-wan (Option D) is optimized for high-latency long-distance links, they can sometimes be too aggressive or poorly suited for standard campus or data center environments. The f5-tcp-progressive profile acts as a "best-of-all-worlds" template that typically provides an immediate performance boost for most web applications by improving window scaling and fast-retransmit behavior. Therefore, it is the procedural "first step" in TCP performance tuning before moving to more specialized, niche profiles.