IFSE Institute LLQP Dumps Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: An insurance contract under Quebec’s Civil Code (Articles 2389–2414) has distinct characteristics. It is a “contract of the utmost good faith”(uberrimae fidei), requiring full disclosure from both parties, especially the insured, about material facts (Article 2408). It is typically a “contract of adhesion,” as insurers offer standard terms with little negotiation (Article 1379), unlike mutual agreement contracts. It is “synallagmatic,” imposing reciprocal obligations—premium payment by the policyholder and coverage by the insurer (Article 1381). It is also “aleatory,” as the outcome depends on an uncertain event, like death or loss (Article 2390). Option C accurately reflects these traits. Option A’s “mutual agreement” suggests negotiation, which is rare in insurance. Option B and D incorrectly state that inaccurate statements are inconsequential—misrepresentations can void a policy (Article 2410)—and B’s “consensual” and D’s “gratuitous” misalign with insurance’s onerous nature (payment for coverage). The Ethics and Professional Practice manual emphasizes advisors’ duty to explain these legal characteristics clearly.

As per LLQP guidelines and privacy regulations in Canada, an insurance agent like Vasu is required to submit all medical and lifestyle-related information to the insurer as part of the application process. Additionally, the agent is permitted to retain a copy of this information in his client file for record-keeping and future reference purposes. It is essential for compliance and potential follow-ups related to policy servicing or claims. Privacy laws do not permit Vasu to share this information with unauthorized parties, such as his supervisor or the client, beyond what is required for processing the application, unless consent has been explicitly provided​​.

=================

In Quebec, an irrevocable beneficiary designation remains in effect even after a divorce, unless the policyholder takes steps to change it. Because Rajbir is designated as the irrevocable beneficiary, Surjit would require Rajbir’s consent to alter the beneficiary designation. Since Surjit intends to keep Rajbir as the beneficiary, he does not need to take any additional action, as the irrevocable beneficiary status remains in force. Surjit cannot change or remove Rajbir as the beneficiary without her consent, so his current designation remains unaffected by the divorce under LLQP guidelines and Quebec civil code rules on irrevocable beneficiaries​​.

=================