Salesforce Rev-Con-201 Dumps Questions Answers

Exact Extracts from Salesforce Subscription Management Implementation Guide (Dynamic Revenue Orchestration):

“Decomposition scope determines how order data is split into fulfillment records.”

“When the decomposition scope is set to Order Line Item, the system creates one fulfillment order line item per decomposed order line.”

“If multiple order lines reference the same product, each is decomposed independently according to its line-level data.”

“Combining order lines into a single fulfillment record only occurs when decomposition scope is at the Order level.”

Step-by-Step Reasoning:

Configuration: Decomposition scope = Order Line Item.

Behavior: Each order line item triggers its own decomposition and fulfillment record.

Result: One fulfillment line per order line (independent of product similarity).

Why A is Correct: Matches the expected behavior of the Order Line Item decomposition scope.

Why B and C are Incorrect:

B: Multiple fulfillment records per order item contradicts “one per line” rule.

C: Combines all items — behavior of “Order” scope, not “Order Line Item.”

References :

Salesforce Subscription Management Implementation Guide — Dynamic Revenue Orchestration: Decomposition Rules and Scopes

Salesforce Billing Implementation Guide — Fulfillment Line Item Creation Logic

Exact Extracts from Salesforce CPQ Advanced Configurator (Constraint Modeling Language Guide):

“Global constants enable administrators to define reusable values that can be referenced across multiple CML rules.”

“Using global constants ensures consistent logic and simplifies maintenance when constraints need to be updated.”

“Avoid hard-coded literals or repetitive local variables in multiple rules, as this increases maintenance complexity.”

Step-by-Step Reasoning:

Requirement: Create a reusable restriction for color “red” across several product rules.

Best Practice: Define global constant, e.g., const BlockedColor = "Red".

Why C is Correct:

Global constants promote reusability and reduce redundancy.

Changing one constant updates all dependent rules automatically.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

A: Local variables are limited to each rule; no reuse.

B: Hardcoding values breaks scalability and maintainability.

References :

Salesforce CPQ Advanced Configurator Developer Guide — Constraint Modeling Language (CML) and Global Constants

Salesforce CPQ Implementation Guide — Best Practices for Constraint Rules and Reusability

When using the Products List (POST) API in Salesforce Revenue Cloud, developers can query and filter the list of available products using specific supported parameters. According to the Salesforce Product Catalog and Discovery API documentation, the valid and commonly used filters for the Products List API include:

Product2 IDs: to retrieve specific products directly by their ID

Catalog IDs: to filter products based on a specific product catalog

Category IDs: to filter products that belong to a particular category within a catalog

This allows developers to fetch only relevant products for a specific UI component or experience, such as in a Product Discovery component or a custom Lightning Web Component (LWC).

Option B includes Pricebook IDs, which are not supported as filter parameters in the Products List API. Pricebooks are used in pricing context but are not valid query parameters for this API endpoint.

Option C includes ProductClassification IDs, which are not supported directly in the POST filter payload of the Products List API.

Exact Extracts from Salesforce Revenue Cloud Documents:

Product Discovery API Developer Guide – “Products List (POST)”:“Use Catalog IDs, Category IDs, and Product2 IDs as input filters in the POST request to retrieve relevant product records for discovery or display.”

Revenue Cloud API Reference – “Querying Product Records”:“The Products List API supports filtering by catalog, category, and direct product identifiers. Pricebooks are not queryable through this API.”