SAP C_OCM_2503 Dumps Questions Answers

In SAP projects, external advisors bring expertise, while internal managers operationalize it. Option A is correct because the internal change manager, embedded in the organization, ensures knowledge transfer for sustainability. Option C is correct as the internal manager executes tasks (e.g., communication) due to their proximity to stakeholders. Option E is correct because the external advisor provides strategic approaches and tools (e.g., templates from SAP Activate), leveraging their expertise. Option B is incorrect—developing plans is collaborative, not solely external. Option D is incorrect; holistic responsibility is shared, not fully outsourced. This division balances external best practices with internal execution.

“External advisors provide best-practice approaches and tools, while internal change managers execute activities and ensure knowledge transfer for long-term capability” (SAP Activate Methodology, Change Management Roles and Responsibilities).

Change agents in SAP OCM extend change management’s reach by handling local activities (e.g., unit-specific workshops). Option C is correct because it scales efforts—e.g., a central change manager can’t train 10 sites alone, but agents in each location can, multiplying coverage efficiently. For instance, an agent in a regional office might run a Q&A session tailored to local process concerns, amplifying OCM impact without overloading the core team.

Option A is incorrect—milestone adherence is a project management outcome, not a direct value of agent tasks. Option B is incorrect; attitude shifts might occur, but it’s not the primary benefit—effectiveness is. Option D is incorrect—reducing manager resistance depends on broader engagement, not just agent activities. SAP OCM leverages agents for scalability.

“Change agents planning and executing local activities add value by scaling change management efforts across the organization effectively” (SAP Activate, Change Network Value).

When communication fails to shift an opponent’s attitude, escalation to a higher authority like the project sponsor is a strategic move in SAP OCM. Option C is correct because the sponsor’s involvement leverages their influence to address resistance, aligning with SAP’s emphasis on leadership support in stakeholder management. Option A is incorrect—financial incentives are not a standard OCM practice and may undermine genuine buy-in. Option B is impractical; steering committee meetings are for decision-making, not resolving individual resistance. Option D could help but is less effective than sponsor engagement, as enablement alone may not address deeper concerns.

Extract from SAP OCM Concepts: SAP Activate recommends leveraging senior leadership (e.g., sponsors) to manage resistant stakeholders (SAP OCM Framework, Stakeholder Management).