PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam
Last Update Jan 5, 2026
Total Questions : 334 With Methodical Explanation
Why Choose CramTick
Last Update Jan 5, 2026
Total Questions : 334
Last Update Jan 5, 2026
Total Questions : 334
Customers Passed
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer
Average Score In Real
Exam At Testing Centre
Questions came word by
word from this dump
Try a free demo of our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PDF and practice exam software before the purchase to get a closer look at practice questions and answers.
We provide up to 3 months of free after-purchase updates so that you get PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice questions of today and not yesterday.
We have a long list of satisfied customers from multiple countries. Our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice questions will certainly assist you to get passing marks on the first attempt.
CramTick offers PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PDF questions, and web-based and desktop practice tests that are consistently updated.
CramTick has a support team to answer your queries 24/7. Contact us if you face login issues, payment, and download issues. We will entertain you as soon as possible.
Thousands of customers passed the PECB PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam exam by using our product. We ensure that upon using our exam products, you are satisfied.
NeuroTrustMed is a leading medical technology company based in Seoul, South Korea. The company specializes in developing AI-assisted neuroimaging solutions used in early diagnosis and treatment planning for neurological disorders. As a data-intensive company handling sensitive patient health records and medical research data, NeuroTrustMed places a strong emphasis on cybersecurity and regulatory compliance. The company has maintained an ISO/IEC 27001-certified ISMS for the past three years. It continuously reviews and improves its ISMS to address emerging threats, support innovation in medical diagnostics, and maintain stakeholder trust. As part of its commitment to continual improvement, NeuroTrustMed actively tracks potential nonconformities, performs root-cause analyses, implements corrective and preventive actions, and ensures all changes are documented and aligned with the company’s strategic objectives. When a new data protection regulation came into effect affecting cross-regional data handling, the information security team conducted a gap assessment between current policies and the new regulation. Then, it updated relevant documentation and processes to meet compliance. Following these revisions, NeuroTrustMed updated the ISMS documentation and added a new entry in the improvement register. The register, maintained in the form of a structured spreadsheet, included a unique change number, a description of the update, and a high-priority classification due to legal compliance, the dates of initiation and completion, and the sign-off by the information security manager. Around the same period, during a scheduled management review, the information security team also identified a pattern of onboarding errors. While these had not resulted in any data breaches, they posed a risk of unauthorized access. In response, the onboarding procedure was revised and an automated verification step was added to ensure accuracy before access is granted. To understand the underlying cause, the team collected data on the provisioning process. They analyzed process logs, interviewed onboarding staff, and traced access errors back to a misconfigured step in the HR-to-IT handover workflow. The team validated this finding through test cases before implementing any changes. Once confirmed, the information security team documented the nonconformity in the ISMS log. The documentation included a description of the issue, impacted systems, affected users, and a brief risk assessment of potential consequences related to access management. Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.
What type of change caused the ISMS update at NeuroTrustMed?
Infralink is a medium-sized IT consultancy firm headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. It specializes in secure cloud infrastructure, software integration, and data analytics, serving a diverse client base in the healthcare, financial services, and legal sectors, including hospitals, insurance providers, and law firms. To safeguard sensitive client data and support business continuity, Infralink has implemented an information security management system (ISMS) aligned with the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001.
In developing its security architecture, the company adopted services to support centralized user identification and shared authentication mechanisms across its departments. These services also governed the creation and management of credentials within the company. Additionally, Infralink deployed solutions to protect sensitive data in transit and at rest, maintaining confidentiality and integrity across its systems.
In preparation for implementing information security controls, the company ensured the availability of necessary resources, personnel competence, and structured planning. It conducted a cost-benefit analysis, scheduled implementation phases, and prepared documentation and activity checklists for each phase. The intended outcomes were clearly defined to align security controls with business objectives.
Infralink started by implementing several controls from Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001. These included regulating physical and logical access to information and assets in accordance with business and information security requirements, managing the identity life cycle, and establishing procedures for providing, reviewing, modifying, and revoking access rights. However, controls related to the secure allocation and management of authentication information, as well as the establishment of rules or agreements for secure information transfer, have not yet been implemented. During the documentation process, the company ensured that all ISMS-related documents supported traceability by including titles, creation or update dates, author names, and unique reference numbers. Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.
Which approach did AegisCute use to implement its ISMS?
Which statement is an example of risk retention?