ITIL ITIL-4-Practitioner-Release-Management Dumps Questions Answers

A common approach to release management aims to improve the reliability and stability of releases. TheITIL® 4 Practitioner: Release Managementdocument highlights key metrics for evaluating the success of release management:"Key metrics for release management often include the percentage of releases that do not result in incidents, as this indicates the stability and reliability of the release process"(Section 5.3).

Option A (Alignment with suppliers) is a process improvement metric but doesn’t directly measure the success of the release outcomes.

Option B (The percentage of releases that do not result in incidents) directly measures the effectiveness of the release process by assessing its impact on service stability, aligning with the goal of a common approach to reduce errors and disruptions.

Option C (Satisfaction rating) is a valuable metric but is more subjective and less directly tied to the operational success of a common approach.

Option D (Number of delayed releases) measures timeliness but not the quality or stability of the releases.

The best metric to assess the success of a standardized release management approach is the reduction in incidents, making B the correct answer.

The ‘collaborate and promote visibility’ guiding principle in ITIL 4 emphasizes working with stakeholders to ensure transparency and alignment with their needs. TheITIL® 4 Practitioner: Release Managementdocument advises:"Applying the ‘collaborate and promote visibility’ principle involves working closely with stakeholders, such as service consumers, to understand their needs and ensure releases do not disrupt their operations, thereby ensuring an excellent user experience"(Section 5.1).

The issue is that updates interrupt work during peak hours, indicating a lack of collaboration with users to understand their schedules and needs.

Option A (Ensure an excellent user experience) directly addresses this by implying collaboration with users to schedule releases at non-disruptive times, aligning with the principle.

Option B (Review the effectiveness of release models) is an internal activity and doesn’t directly involve collaboration with stakeholders.

Option C (Optimize the practice for the value streams) focuses on value stream efficiency but doesn’t specifically address user collaboration.

Option D (Do not overcomplicate the practice) is unrelated to the collaboration principle.

The correct answer is A, as ensuring an excellent user experience through collaboration directly applies the principle to address the issue.

TheITIL® 4 Practitioner: Release Managementdocument explains the difference between push and pull approaches in release management:"In a push approach, updates are deployed to users without giving them a choice, often to ensure compliance or security. In a pull approach, users can choose when to adopt updates"(Section 3.2.3).

Option A (A ‘pull’ approach) is incorrect because a pull approach allows users to choose when to accept updates, which contradicts the scenario.

Option B (A ‘push’ approach) is correct, as the policy of not allowing users to choose means the updates are automatically deployed to them, fitting the definition of a push approach.

Option C (Continuous delivery) and Option D (Continuous integration) are development practices, not release deployment strategies. Continuous delivery involves making releases available frequently, but it doesn’t specify whether users must accept them (push) or can choose (pull).

The scenario describes a push approach, making B the correct answer.